2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1972 ZIL 114
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 ZIL 114. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 ZIL 114 would be higher. At 6,959 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 ZIL 114 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 ZIL 114 (296 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (164 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 ZIL 114 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1972 ZIL 114 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 ZIL 114. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 364 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (216 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 1972 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1972 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Chevrolet | ZIL |
Model | Malibu | 114 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 6959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 296 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3770 mm |