2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1977 Mazda 818
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 818. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 818 would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (219 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 151 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 818. (68 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 818.
Because 1977 Mazda 818 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Mazda 818. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 818. (92 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 818.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1977 Mazda 818 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Malibu | 818 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 1271 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 219 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 297 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2320 mm |