2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1982 Suzuki Alto
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Suzuki Alto. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Suzuki Alto would be higher. At 3,498 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (219 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1982 Suzuki Alto. (38 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1982 Suzuki Alto.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Suzuki Alto. (59 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Suzuki Alto.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1982 Suzuki Alto | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | Malibu | Alto |
Year Released | 2008 | 1982 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3498 cc | 796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 219 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 297 Nm | 59 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1410 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2160 mm |