2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (252 HP @ 6300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (340 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Malibu | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3600 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 252 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6300 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 214 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 8000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1360 mm |
