2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford Artic. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford Artic would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (170 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic.
Because 2000 Ford Artic is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Artic. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford Artic (325 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (217 Nm). This means 2000 Ford Artic will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Malibu | Artic |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 170 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 217 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 68 L |