2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Malibu | Karma |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 164 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 36 L |
