2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2013 BMW X5 M
To start off, 2013 BMW X5 M is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 4,395 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW X5 M is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW X5 M (547 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 383 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (164 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 2013 BMW X5 M is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 BMW X5 M will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 BMW X5 M (678 Nm @ 5650 RPM) has 462 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. (216 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2013 BMW X5 M will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Malibu.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 2013 BMW X5 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | BMW |
Model | Malibu | X5 M |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2401 cc | 4395 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 164 HP | 547 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 678 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4851 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 2197 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1764 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2933 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.4 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9.8 L/100km | 16.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 85 L |