2008 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2013 Mini Roadster
To start off, 2013 Mini Roadster is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Malibu (297 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Mini Roadster. (160 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Mini Roadster. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu has automatic transmission and 2013 Mini Roadster has manual transmission. 2013 Mini Roadster will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Malibu will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Malibu | 2013 Mini Roadster | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mini |
Model | Malibu | Roadster |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 219 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 297 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3728 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1384 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2467 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.4 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 10.7 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |