2008 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. (48 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 240 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. (91 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1963 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Matiz | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Triumph |
Model | Matiz | 2000 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 91 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 64 L |