2008 Chevrolet Matiz vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Matiz is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,491 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Volkswagen 1500 (52 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. (48 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Volkswagen 1500 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Matiz. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Matiz weights approximately 70 kg more than 1963 Volkswagen 1500.
Because 1963 Volkswagen 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Volkswagen 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Matiz, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Matiz | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Matiz | 1500 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 993 cc | 1491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 930 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 40 L |