2008 Chevrolet Optra vs. 2004 Mercury Sable
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Optra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mercury Sable. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mercury Sable would be higher. At 2,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mercury Sable is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercury Sable (155 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Optra. (103 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercury Sable should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Optra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mercury Sable weights approximately 338 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Optra. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mercury Sable (251 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Optra. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Mercury Sable will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Optra.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Optra | 2004 Mercury Sable | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mercury |
Model | Optra | Sable |
Year Released | 2008 | 2004 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 103 HP | 155 HP |
Torque | 150 Nm | 251 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 79 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81.5 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.5:1 | 9.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1175 kg | 1513 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.5 L/100km | 10.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 68 L |