2008 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (197 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo weights approximately 196 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (233 Nm @ 2100 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | Rezzo | 200 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1410 mm |