2008 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger weights approximately 449 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Rezzo | 1996 Mitsubishi Challenger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | Rezzo | Challenger |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1381 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2730 mm |