2008 Chevrolet Rezzo vs. 2007 Mazda CX-9
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Mazda CX-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Mazda CX-9 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2007 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (263 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo. (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2007 Mazda CX-9 (338 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo. (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2007 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Rezzo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Rezzo | 2007 Mazda CX-9 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Rezzo | CX-9 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 3496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 338 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 5080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 76 L |