2008 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1995 Mazda RX-01
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,614 cc, 1995 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 322 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Because 1995 Mazda RX-01 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Mazda RX-01. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Spark, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda RX-01 (216 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Spark. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Spark | 1995 Mazda RX-01 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Spark | RX-01 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 2614 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 778 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 65 L |