2008 Chevrolet Spark vs. 1996 Renault Megane
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Renault Megane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Renault Megane would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Renault Megane weights approximately 572 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Renault Megane (200 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 113 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Spark. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1996 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Spark | 1996 Renault Megane | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Spark | Megane |
Year Released | 2008 | 1996 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1868 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 96 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Top Speed | 154 km/hour | 174 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15.4 seconds | 12.7 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 778 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1610 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.3 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 60 L |