2008 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2003 Mazda 2
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 2 would be higher. At 1,397 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mazda 2 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Mazda 2 (168 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Spark. (87 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2003 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Spark | 2003 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Spark | 2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2003 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 995 cc | 1397 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 87 Nm | 168 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 68 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 850 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3500 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 50 L |