2008 Chevrolet Spark vs. 2006 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Spark is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-150 (226 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 175 more horse power than 2008 Chevrolet Spark. (51 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-150 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 319 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Spark. (69 Nm @ 4600 RPM). This means 2006 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Spark.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Spark | 2006 Ford E-150 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Spark | E-150 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 795 cc | 4605 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 388 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3510 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.3 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 132 L |
