2008 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 1972 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (151 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1972 Datsun 240Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (461 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 263 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Datsun 240Z. (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Datsun 240Z.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Suburban | 1972 Datsun 240Z | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Datsun |
| Model | Suburban | 240Z |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5328 cc | 2393 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 151 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 4140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2300 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 11 L/100km |
