2008 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2000 Ford TL-50
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TL-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TL-50 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2000 Ford TL-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TL-50.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Ford TL-50. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford TL-50 (570 Nm) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chevrolet Suburban. (454 Nm). This means 2000 Ford TL-50 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chevrolet Suburban.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Suburban | 2000 Ford TL-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | TL-50 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5328 cc | 1798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 570 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 37 L |