2008 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2002 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (320 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 2002 Ford Econoline. (198 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Because 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (461 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Suburban | 2002 Ford Econoline | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | Suburban | Econoline |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5328 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 320 HP | 198 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4700 RPM |
| Torque | 461 Nm | 338 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2700 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 5390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 2060 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3510 mm |
