2008 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 5,328 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (310 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Suburban (454 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford E-150. (389 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Suburban | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | E-150 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5328 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 310 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 454 Nm | 389 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5660 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.9 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 117 L | 132 L |