2008 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 1975 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (296 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (118 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (414 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Tahoe | 1975 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tahoe | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4800 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 296 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 414 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1960 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 2480 mm |