2008 Chevrolet Tahoe vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 5,326 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (284 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (230 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Raider.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Tahoe | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Tahoe | Raider |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5326 cc | 4703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 284 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 427 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2070 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1970 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2950 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.9 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 83 L |
