2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1967 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (285 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (66 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1967 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 59 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (374 Nm @ 4600 RPM) has 228 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Nissan Cedric. (146 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1967 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2164 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 285 HP | 66 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 374 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4600 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2700 mm |
