2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,156 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1211 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | TrailBlazer | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1972 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4156 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2153 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1830 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2210 mm |