2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 276 more horse power than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1090 kg more than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (536 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 371 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe. (165 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1975 Mazda RX 4 Coupe | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | TrailBlazer | RX 4 Coupe |
Year Released | 2008 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 2616 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 165 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2520 mm |