2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 5,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (390 HP) has 309 more horse power than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 341 kg more than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (536 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 409 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1983 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | TrailBlazer | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2008 | 1983 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 536 Nm | 127 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1261 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 57 L |