2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1986 Rover 825
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Rover 825. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Rover 825 would be higher. At 5,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (390 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 272 more horse power than 1986 Rover 825. (118 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1986 Rover 825. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 724 kg more than 1986 Rover 825. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Rover 825. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (536 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Rover 825. (268 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Rover 825. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer has automatic transmission and 1986 Rover 825 has manual transmission. 1986 Rover 825 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1986 Rover 825 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
Model | TrailBlazer | 825 |
Year Released | 2008 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5999 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 390 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 536 Nm | 268 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 1476 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.8 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 83 L | 68 L |