2008 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,880 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 160 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Uplander.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2008 Chevrolet Uplander has automatic transmission and 1951 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1951 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chevrolet Uplander will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Uplander | 1951 Riley RM A | |
Make | Chevrolet | Riley |
Model | Uplander | RM A |
Year Released | 2008 | 1951 |
Engine Size | 3880 cc | 1495 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1075 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 2870 mm |