2008 Chevrolet Uplander vs. 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche
To start off, 2008 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche weights approximately 86 kg more than 2008 Chevrolet Uplander.
Because 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Uplander, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chevrolet Uplander | 1984 Rolls-Royce Corniche | |
Make | Chevrolet | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Uplander | Corniche |
Year Released | 2008 | 1984 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3880 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 240 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2200 kg | 2286 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5200 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3080 mm | 3030 mm |