2008 Chevrolet Vivant vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chevrolet Vivant. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chevrolet Vivant would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chevrolet Vivant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chevrolet Vivant (119 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Vivant should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chevrolet Vivant weights approximately 706 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chevrolet Vivant, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chevrolet Vivant (176 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chevrolet Vivant will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chevrolet Vivant | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Tata |
| Model | Vivant | Nano |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1306 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2230 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.7 L/100km | 4.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 37 L |
