2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 6,059 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler 300 (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 1962 Dodge Polara. (301 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1962 Dodge Polara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 290 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | Polara |
Year Released | 2008 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6059 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 425 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2960 mm |