2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 1963 Citroen DS
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,986 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler 300 (215 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1963 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 590 kg more than 1963 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chrysler 300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Chrysler 300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 1963 Citroen DS | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | 300 | DS |
Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2986 cc | 1911 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5020 mm | 5000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.1 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 71 L | 43 L |