2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2001 Daewoo Vada

To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Vada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Vada would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 597 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Vada.

Because 2008 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2001 Daewoo Vada. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (526 Nm) has 382 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Vada. (144 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Vada.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Chrysler 300 2001 Daewoo Vada
Make Chrysler Daewoo
Model 300 Vada
Year Released 2008 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5645 cc 1598 cc
Horse Power 0 HP 105 HP
Torque 526 Nm 144 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Vehicle Weight 1910 kg 1313 kg
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2530 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]