2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Chrysler LHS
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Chrysler LHS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Chrysler LHS (250 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Chrysler LHS should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Chrysler LHS (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Chrysler LHS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler 300 | 2002 Chrysler LHS | |
| Make | Chrysler | Chrysler |
| Model | 300 | LHS |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 3516 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 250 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 327 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3040 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |
