2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2002 Jaguar S-Type

To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Jaguar S-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Jaguar S-Type would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar S-Type (205 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar S-Type should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.

Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Jaguar S-Type. (250 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Jaguar S-Type.

Compare all specifications:

2008 Chrysler 300 2002 Jaguar S-Type
Make Chrysler Jaguar
Model 300 S-Type
Year Released 2008 2002
Body Type Sedan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2736 cc 2498 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Horse Power 190 HP 205 HP
Engine RPM 6400 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 258 Nm 250 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4000 RPM
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5010 mm 4880 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 3050 mm 2920 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 69 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]