2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2005 Ford E-250
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Ford E-250. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Ford E-250 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler 300 (336 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 2005 Ford E-250. (225 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford E-250. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-250 weights approximately 431 kg more than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (525 Nm) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford E-250. (388 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford E-250.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2005 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | E-250 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 336 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 525 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1873 kg | 2304 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.5 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 73 L | 132 L |