2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2005 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Rover 25. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Rover 25 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler 300 (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2005 Rover 25. (83 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2005 Rover 25.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 148 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Rover 25. (110 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Rover 25. 2008 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2005 Rover 25 has manual transmission. 2005 Rover 25 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2005 Rover 25 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | 300 | 25 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 110 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |