2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Holden Epica
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Holden Epica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Holden Epica would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2008 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Holden Epica. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (526 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | 300 | Epica |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5645 cc | 2492 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
| Torque | 526 Nm | 237 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 12 L/100km | 9.3 L/100km |
