2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Nissan Armada weights approximately 597 kg more than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (526 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Nissan Armada. (522 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Nissan Armada.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 300 | Armada |
Year Released | 2008 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5645 cc | 5555 cc |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Torque | 526 Nm | 522 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 2507 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2010 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 106 L |