2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2007 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2008 Chrysler 300 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2007 Toyota Tundra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2007 Toyota Tundra would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Toyota Tundra (271 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (246 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Toyota Tundra (424 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2007 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2007 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | 300 | Tundra |
Year Released | 2008 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 271 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 424 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.0:1 |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 3710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 100 L |