2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2009 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2009 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 945 kg more than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion.
Because 2008 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (526 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 394 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion. (132 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Daihatsu Sirion.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2009 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Chrysler | Daihatsu |
Model | 300 | Sirion |
Year Released | 2008 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5645 cc | 1494 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 102 HP |
Torque | 526 Nm | 132 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 91.8 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 6.4 seconds | 10.5 seconds |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 965 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 3640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12 L/100km | 6.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |