2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (304 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (246 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 58 kg more than 2010 Cadillac CTS.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (370 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | 300 | CTS |
Year Released | 2008 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 304 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 370 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1757 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1473 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3060 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |