2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 BMW 640
To start off, 2012 BMW 640 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 BMW 640 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 BMW 640 (311 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 BMW 640 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 BMW 640 (630 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 372 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2012 BMW 640 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2012 BMW 640 | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | 300 | 640 |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 2993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 311 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 630 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 8-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4894 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1894 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1365 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2855 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 4.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 5.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 70 L |