2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler 300 (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (95 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (230 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max. 2008 Chrysler 300 has automatic transmission and 2012 Ford C-Max has manual transmission. 2012 Ford C-Max will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2008 Chrysler 300 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | C-Max |
Year Released | 2008 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2736 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 230 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2788 mm |