2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,645 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 663 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Because 2008 Chrysler 300 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Honda CR-Z. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler 300 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (526 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 352 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Honda CR-Z. (174 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Compare all specifications:
2008 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | 300 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5645 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Torque | 526 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 89 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2435 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 40 L |