2008 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Volvo C70
To start off, 2013 Volvo C70 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,736 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo C70 (224 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo C70 should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler 300 (258 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C70. (236 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C70.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Volvo C70 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | 300 | C70 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2736 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | boxer |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 5 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 224 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 258 Nm | 236 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1836 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.1 L/100km | 7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.1 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
