2008 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 789 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (447 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2008 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Aspen | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
| Model | Aspen | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 303 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 447 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1959 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 64 L |
