2008 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1966 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Chrysler Aspen (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1966 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1966 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 1149 kg more than 1966 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2008 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 DAF Daffodil. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2008 Chrysler Aspen | 1966 DAF Daffodil | |
| Make | Chrysler | DAF |
| Model | Aspen | Daffodil |
| Year Released | 2008 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 746 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 303 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 666 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 3620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2060 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 33 L |
